Orbiter-Forum Thermal radiation and water freezing
 User Name Remember Me? Password
 Register Blogs Orbinauts List Social Groups FAQ Projects Mark Forums Read

 Math & Physics Mathematical and physical problems of space flight and astronomy.

 08-11-2019, 02:10 PM #1 Furet Orbinaut Thermal radiation and water freezing I'm referring to this brilliant post from Jedidia: "Spacecraft design for dummies" https://www.orbiter-forum.com/group....scussionid=286 and particularly this part in the thermodynamics chapter: Quote: Many people think that space is awfully cold. Well, surprise: Space is not. [...] It is a Vacuum, and vacuum is a term we use to describe the absence (or mostly absence) of matter. Matter can be warm or cold. If there's no matter, there's nothing there to be warm, or cold, or whatever. Reading this made me wonder what would happen if a rude astronaut litters a closed bottle of water in deep space. In short, how long would it take for water to freeze? I found no explicit website yet about that and decided to try the calculation. My hypothesis and rough calculation are as follows:The sun radiation is ignored (too far from it, or in the shadow of a planet). The water container thermal properties are ignored, and the inner pressure is assumed standard. The water cooling is assumed linear. Calculation of the radiating power:Water volume: 1 liter. Water is contained in a cylindrical container: radius 0.046m, height 0.15m, therefore a surface of 0.05675 m² Water initial temperature is 293°K (20°C) Water emissivity: 0.95 Radiating power of water at 293°K, according to Boltzman law (P = sk * T^4 * e): 397 W/m² Radiating power of the water cylinder: 397*0.05675 = 22.53 WCalculation of the energy loss for a temperature change from 293°K to 273°K (20°C to 0°C):Water specific heat: 4186 J/kg Water mass: 1 kg Change in temperature: 20°K Energy loss (specif heat * mass * temperature change): 83720 JTime to radiate 83720 J:83720 / 22.53 = 3716 s, or approximately 62 minutes.I know this is very basic math, but does that look roughly realistic? To be honest, I was expecting a much longer time, at least longer than for convection/conduction cooling. I tried to freeze 1 liter of water in my freezer and it took way longer. This is possibly because the cooling process is not linear, and the temperature in the freezer is pretty high with respect to the absolute zero (minus 20°C is 253°K, after all).
 08-11-2019, 05:35 PM #2 Linguofreak Orbinaut You're missing the heat of fusion/solidification of water. To freeze, water at 0° C must emit the same amount of energy as it would emit in cooling from 80° C to zero (the amount of energy associated with the water steam transition is even greater). And, of course, the time to emit that energy falling from 80 to 0 will be less than the time to emit that energy at 0 the whole time (because you get more blackbody radiation at higher temperatures). You're also assuming that the water is radiating at 20° C the entire time, and the radiative power at 20° C is about 22% greater than at 0°. Furthermore, freezing causes water to expand, which, depending on the air space in the bottle will increase the pressure by some amount (possibly quite extreme if there is little air space), and pressure causes the freezing point of water to drop, which will increase the amount of cooling required by a little bit (the heat of fusion may also be affected by pressure, which may well be a greater effect, I'm not sure). The water will have to do work on the air in the container and the walls of the container to expand, and I'm not exactly sure exactly how this will effect the cooling time (very likely the freezing point drop and any change in heat of fusion with pressure already take this into account).
 Thanked by:
 08-11-2019, 05:46 PM #3 RisingFury OBSP developer Does the astronaut have to take off the helmet to drink from the bottle before or after unscrewing the cap?
 08-11-2019, 08:43 PM #4 Furet Orbinaut Quote: Originally Posted by RisingFury  Does the astronaut have to take off the helmet to drink from the bottle before or after unscrewing the cap? Surely not. I would have to calculate the freezing time of the astronaut. ---------- Post added at 20:43 ---------- Previous post was at 20:01 ---------- Quote: Originally Posted by Linguofreak  You're missing the heat of fusion/solidification of water. To freeze, water at 0° C must emit the same amount of energy as it would emit in cooling from 80° C to zero (the amount of energy associated with the water steam transition is even greater) Oops! I didn't know that. Your remark led me to find these articles: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freezing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enthalpy_of_fusion Quote: Originally Posted by Linguofreak  You're also assuming that the water is radiating at 20° C the entire time, and the radiative power at 20° C is about 22% greater than at 0°. I didn't realize that the difference is so significant. I'm missing the math yet to calculate the extra time, but I'll try again. Quote: Originally Posted by Linguofreak   Furthermore, freezing causes water to expand, which, depending on the air space in the bottle will increase the pressure by some amount (possibly quite extreme if there is little air space), and pressure causes the freezing point of water to drop, which will increase the amount of cooling required by a little bit (the heat of fusion may also be affected by pressure, which may well be a greater effect, I'm not sure). The water will have to do work on the air in the container and the walls of the container to expand, and I'm not exactly sure exactly how this will effect the cooling time (very likely the freezing point drop and any change in heat of fusion with pressure already take this into account). Yes, I do agree. But I really have no idea on how to compute this too. Let's assume a standard pressure in the container during the whole freezing process. Thanks for your comments, Linguofreak.
 08-11-2019, 08:58 PM #5 Linguofreak Orbinaut Quote: Originally Posted by Furet   I didn't realize that the difference is so significant. I'm missing the math yet to calculate the extra time, but I'll try again. Never underestimate the difference an x^4 term can make. I'm not very confident with calculus myself, so I'm afraid I can't help you with exactly how much longer it would take. EDIT: TBH, though, the enthalpy of fusion will almost certainly be the dominant factor in the extra time. The difference between radiative power at 20 C and 0 C will make a contribution to the extra time over your estimate that's guaranteed to be less than 22%, while the freezing process after reaching 0 C will add 488% (400% because the heat of fusion is equivalent to an 80 degree temperature change, multiplied by 1.22 because of the fact that freezing happens at 0 C rather than 20 C, and the energy is being carried off radiatively). Last edited by Linguofreak; 08-12-2019 at 12:12 AM.
 Thanked by:
 08-13-2019, 07:56 AM #6 Linguofreak Orbinaut Gaak! I made a stupid error with the math: I'd previously had my calculator in hexidecimal input / octal output mode for some computer related stuff, and I remembered to switch the output mode to decimal, but not the input mode, so I calculated the difference between radiative power at 659 K and 627 K (0x293 and 0x273) rather than between 293 K and 273 K The difference in radiative power between 20 C and 0 C is more like 33 percent!
 Thanked by:
 08-13-2019, 09:52 AM #7 Urwumpe Certain Super User Also, doesn't blackbody radiation behave differently when the object is not a perfectly black body? AFAIR, there are some weird effects if the true spectrum of the body is not like in the theory.
 08-13-2019, 10:51 AM #8 Linguofreak Orbinaut Quote: Originally Posted by Urwumpe  Also, doesn't blackbody radiation behave differently when the object is not a perfectly black body? AFAIR, there are some weird effects if the true spectrum of the body is not like in the theory. I believe there are some differences, but I'm not sure that water deviates enough from a blackbody at the wavelengths involved at ~273 K.
 08-14-2019, 02:21 AM #9 Thunder Chicken Fine Threads since 2008 You have most of the physics correct, but the math is a bit more involved. The emission E from the bottle to space (assuming 0K surroundings) will be equal to the rate of change of thermal energy of the water. While it is liquid the equation that needs to be solved is: e A k T^4 = m c dT/dt Where e - emissivity A - surface area k - Stefann-Boltzmann constant m - water mass c - liquid water specific heat T - water temperature t - time Emissive power changes with time as T changes with time. Integrating this out I get an elapsed time of 4285 s to cool from 293K to 273K. Once the water hits the freezing point (T = 273K), the temperature of the water remains constant during the phase change, and the emissive power remains constant. e A k T^4 = constant = m dh/t_f where dh is the enthalpy of fusion of water ice. t_f is the elapsed time of the freezing process and is easy to calculate as everything in this equation is constant: t_f = m dh / e A k T^4 With your numbers: t_f = (1 kg)x(333.55 kJ/kg) / (0.95 x 0.05675 mÂ² x 5.67e-08 W/m^2 K^4 x (273K^4)) t_f = 19,645 s or about 5.5 hrs (if my math is correct). This is just the time required to accomplish the phase change to solid ice at 273K and needs to be added to the time for the liquid cooling process, 4285 s. So the total time would be 23,930 s or about 6 hrs and 40 minutes.* TL;DR - radiation heat transfer is *very* inefficient, ice can absorb a *lot* of energy while melting. *Entirely possible there is a math error, but I think it is correct. Last edited by Thunder Chicken; 08-14-2019 at 03:16 AM.
 Thanked by:
 08-15-2019, 10:50 AM #10 Furet Orbinaut Quote: Originally Posted by Thunder Chicken  Entirely possible there is a math error, but I think it is correct. The first part of the calculus with the integration is beyond my math skills so I had to ask for help to a friend of mine. He eventually found the same results as yours. Things are clearer for me now. This is very interesting and I've learnt. Thanks very much to you all.
 Thanked by:
 08-15-2019, 03:33 PM #11 Thunder Chicken Fine Threads since 2008 Quote: Originally Posted by Furet  The first part of the calculus with the integration is beyond my math skills so I had to ask for help to a friend of mine. He eventually found the same results as yours. It's always good to get a confirmation.

 Posting Rules BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Orbiter-Forum.com     Announcements     Meets & Greets Orbiter Space Flight Simulator     Orbiter Web Forum         OFMM         Orbiter Forum Space Station         Simpit Forum     General Questions & Help     MFD Questions & Help     Hardware & Software Help     Tutorials & Challenges     Orbiter SDK     Orbiter Visualization Project     Orbiter Beta » Orbiter Project Orbiter Addons     OrbitHangar Addons & Comments     Addons     Addon Development     Addon Requests     Addon Support & Bugs         Addon Developer Forums             Project Apollo - NASSP     Orbiter Lua Scripting Far Side of the Moon     Spaceflight News     Math & Physics     Astronomy & the Night Sky     Backyard Rocketry     Brighton Lounge     International Forum

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:20 PM.

About Us | Rules & Guidelines | TOS Policy | Privacy Policy

Orbiter-Forum is hosted at Orbithangar.com