Orbiter-Forum Can I get the Vector components xyz given only this information?
 User Name Remember Me? Password
 Register Blogs Orbinauts List Social Groups FAQ Projects Mark Forums Read

 Math & Physics Mathematical and physical problems of space flight and astronomy.

 06-02-2019, 01:35 AM #1 ncc1701d Orbinaut Can I get the Vector components xyz given only this information? hello, I have these 3 dates and I know the position X Y Z of moon Amalthea relative to Jupiter and then I know the Velocity Vectors V for each one. I need to get the VX VY VZ components for each of the 3 date-times. Do I have enough information to get those from what you see? I believe I need the instantaneous values. I am aware of VX = dx/dt, VY = dy/dt, VZ = dz/dt and I know VX + VY + VZ = V I am interested in the math behind finding those components given what I have. If you know the procedure can you tell me what it is? or shed some light on how I might solve the problem if its possible? thank you. 1979 MAR 05 00:00:00 -178932.619 km -28063.045 km -17448.755 km V = -29.804114 km/sec 1979 MAR 05 00:02:00 -178337.419 km -30878.143 km -18771.071 km V = -29.231286 km/sec 1979 MAR 05 00:04:00 -177688.033 km -33683.859 km -20087.682 km V = 28.649604 km/sec thank you. I do have the answers if someone knew how to do it. I can check to see if your right. Last edited by ncc1701d; 06-02-2019 at 01:45 AM.
 06-02-2019, 01:48 AM #2 Quick_Nick Passed the Turing Test If I understand correctly, you have XYZ position information and a speed, and you want XYZ velocity information. This can get really complicated if you care about a perfect answer. However I would say simply knowing that the orbit is nearly circular and nearly equatorial is enough information to have a pretty good idea of the velocity vector. You need to know what coordinate frame those XYZ values are in though. Edit: I'm thinking you may actually care about a more accurate answer given your three times are less than an orbit apart. I suspect you can in fact evaluate those three points together to get some orbital parameters out. Last edited by Quick_Nick; 06-02-2019 at 01:55 AM.
 06-03-2019, 01:16 PM #3 Marijn Orbinaut I think this article describes the required math. It's not easy. https://science.larouchepac.com/gaus...erProblem.html
 Thanked by:
 06-06-2019, 02:32 PM #4 BrianJ thing Hi, thanks for the interesting problem to think about :-) I can get the semimajor axis (a) and the standard gravitational parameter (mu) from the vis-viva equation; v^2 = mu*(2/r - 1/a) But then I get stuck! Then I thought maybe it was an energy-conservation problem (Potential + Kinetic = Constant) but I'm not getting anywhere with that. Since the times of the data points are given, I'm pretty sure that is necessary information. Needs some kind of insight regarding Kepler's 2nd law (radius sweeps out equal areas in equal times) maybe? I think that the shape of an ellipse is completely determined by three points (pos vectors), so theoretically you should be able to find the equation of the ellipse and the tangent at a given point - but the math for doing that in 3D is looking really gnarly, so I'm not even thinking about that :-) Anyway, I'm having fun playing with this one. Cheers, Brian P.S. Your first two Velocity values are negative - typo?
 06-06-2019, 06:08 PM #5 ncc1701d Orbinaut the checkmarked answer I found here might provide the answer. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/...elocity-vector Although not sure its that simple yet. I am still researching.
 Thanked by:
 07-12-2019, 08:49 PM #7 BrianJ thing Hi, wow! Thanks so much, I would never have got those later steps. Magic indeed
 Thanked by:
 07-13-2019, 03:38 AM #8 MontBlanc2012 Orbinaut Actually, it occurs to me that the solution to ncc1701d's original problem is actually quite trivial - given that we are given the time of flight on each of the arc segments (120 seconds each). This means that the information about speeds is superfluous and one just needs to use a standard Lambert Solver to solve the problem. However, we can also use the maths set out above to do the same job of solving the Lambert Problem, - so, in outline, here's the solution: In SI units, the first and second Jupiter-centric positions of Amalthea are: We also know that for Jupiter, the accepted value (in SI units) of the gravitational parameter is . And we know the time of flight is 120 seconds. As before calculate: Now set and as functions of an as yet unknown semi-major axis : where and are the two roots of the equation . As it turns out, for elliptical orbits, the transfer time from the initial to final points can be calculated as: So, now we have an expression that is a function of only. And since we know that the orbit of Amalthea is almost circular, we use a standard Newton root-finding algorithm with an initial guess of 180,000 km. From this, we deduce that: and hence and Then, the radial and transverse components of the velocity vector at the are given by: and the radial and transverse components of the velocity vector at the are given by: And from this it is straightforward to convert back to the x-y-z coordinates of the original coordinate system. N.B. In case you were wondering what the orbital eccentricity is, we get this from the expression: i.e., very nearly a circular orbit. Yay! ---------- Post added at 03:38 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:15 AM ---------- And finally, just a quick comment on ncc1701d's summation of velocity vector components (V = VX + VY + VZ). Initially, I thought this was a typo and ncc1701d really meant V^2 = VX^2 + VY^2 + VZ^2 - which is, by far and away the more conventional way of 'adding' velocity components. As it turns, out, I was wrong: ncc1701d actually did mean the straight arithmetic sum of the velocity components. How do I know this? Well, I can calculate the x-y-z representation of the radial and transverse unit vectors at that point. Although I'm not going to bother showing the intermediate calculations, in x-y-z coordinates the radial unit vector is: and the transverse unit vector is: So, the velocity vector at the first point in ncc1701d's list can be written as: So, at that point, VX = 4734.483; VY = -23495.74; and VZ = -11041.87. And the straight arithmetic sum of those is -29803.12 which is suspiciously close to the value given by ncc1701d of -29804.11. Last edited by MontBlanc2012; 07-17-2019 at 03:43 AM.
 Thanked by:
 07-14-2019, 03:26 PM #9 BrianJ thing Thanks for the further insight. I was on the wrong track to start with, since I had assumed the OP actually meant V^2 = VX^2 + VY^2 + VZ^2. Note to self: always read the question carefully! Cheers, Brian
 Thanked by:
 07-16-2019, 07:35 AM #10 ncc1701d Orbinaut thank you everyone for all the feedback!

 Posting Rules BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Orbiter-Forum.com     Announcements     Meets & Greets Orbiter Space Flight Simulator     Orbiter Web Forum         OFMM         Orbiter Forum Space Station         Simpit Forum     General Questions & Help     MFD Questions & Help     Hardware & Software Help     Tutorials & Challenges     Orbiter SDK     Orbiter Visualization Project     Orbiter Beta » Orbiter Project Orbiter Addons     OrbitHangar Addons & Comments     Addons     Addon Development     Addon Requests     Addon Support & Bugs         Addon Developer Forums             Project Apollo - NASSP     Orbiter Lua Scripting Far Side of the Moon     Spaceflight News     Math & Physics     Astronomy & the Night Sky     Backyard Rocketry     Brighton Lounge     International Forum

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:56 PM.

About Us | Rules & Guidelines | TOS Policy | Privacy Policy

Orbiter-Forum is hosted at Orbithangar.com