![]() |
|
|||||||
| Astronomy & the Night Sky Astronomy news & discussions, Astrophotography, Telescopes, Star Charts, & more. Galaxies, Stars, Planets & Moons, discuss it all here! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Orbinaut
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
shoemaker without legs
![]() |
How on earth do you identify a freaking molecule 400 lightyears away???
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Aperiodic traveller
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Thanked by: |
|
|
#4 |
|
shoemaker without legs
![]() |
Impressive. Now why does this not work on exoplanetary atmospheres?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Mostly Harmless
|
An aside:
(Sorry -- when I read the title, it was the first thing that came to mind. )
Last edited by Scav; 08-30-2012 at 02:55 AM. |
|
|
|
| Thanked by: |
|
|
#6 |
|
Orbinaut
|
It does.
Several of the exoplanets have provided spectrographic data when their stars light passing through their atmospheres have been received and analyzed. Take a look for how the "water planet" was identified. Last edited by llarian; 08-30-2012 at 12:38 PM. |
|
|
|
| Thanked by: |
|
|
#7 |
|
Orbinaut
|
So does that mean if alien life were to evolve there it could end up having similar RNA or DNA composition to ours?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
OBSP developer
![]() |
Quote:
You wait for the planet to pass through the star, that way you get the spectroscopic reading for the planet and start combined. Then you wait for the planet to pass behind the star and you get the spectroscopic reading for the star only. Then you subtract them and you get the reading for the planet. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
O-F Administrator
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Moderator
![]() ![]() |
That's really important discovery & IMHO it shows potential of humankind.
Locating & identifying "few" molecues over 400 lightyears away is really impressive achievement. Also it's next step in searching for origin of life. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|||||
| Quick Links | Need Help? |